A Big Loss For Microsoft

Howard Blume:

A Microsoft representative urged the board to pilot more than one product and not to rely on one platform. Doing so could cut off the district from future price reductions and innovations, said Robyn Hines, senior director of state government affairs for Microsoft.

This is a huge loss for Microsoft. It's partly because of the lost sale, but also because of this nugget.

Hines also noted that more businesses still use Microsoft platforms, and that students should be exposed to machines they will encounter in the workplace.

AutoCad offers a free version of its software for college students. Why is this important? Because it keeps students using the products. When they enter the workforce, AutoCad is the software they will be comfortable with. L.A. students won't be familiar with Microsoft and the employee IT budgets will soon follow. A huge argument against Apple in the enterprise in 2004 (retraining) will be an arguement against Microsoft in 2025. This is a company assuming it will always be the default for the enterprise.

Big businesses generally don't become irrelevant overnight. This is slow ride to irrelevance for Microsoft.

Office for iPhone is Dead on Arrival

Microsoft has finally released Office for iPhone (no iPad version) and it requires an Office 365 subscription ($99 per year). I am going to assume 2 things:

  1. It is a completely bug free app.
  2. It is on par with iWork and Google Drive for iPhone in terms of functionality.

Are a lot of business customers still very entrenched in being a Microsoft organization (Exchange, Microsoft Server, etc)? Yes, that is absolutely correct. My question is that how many of those folks are also paying for Office 365? I would have assumed that customers paying for Microsoft's Software Assurance (keeps customers up to date on all Microsoft products) would automatically have access, but it seems those programs are separate. So we have the most loyal (and probably largest) customers not even having access to an iPhone only app unless they have this extra service that isn't connected to anything they have internally right now?

Over on the Google Apps side, the app is free and you just login with your Google (or Google Apps) account. On the iWork side, the app functions perfectly without syncing, but it also has iCloud built in. I recognize that this might not be comparing apples to apples. Microsoft has a legacy customer base with on premise products and is also trying to build its cloud services portfolio. They really have 2 distinct subsets of customers: cloud customers and on premise customers. Unless I am missing something, on premise customers have no path to using Office for iPhone without paying an extra subscription fee. The 365 customer base will love the addition, but I have got to imagine that is an extremely small number compared to the on premise customers. This also eliminates schools from using it (assuming an iPad version is coming) unless they are a 365 school. I think they would have been much better off by charging a nominal purchase fee for the app. I think if a standalone (with optional syncing options) universal version was released for $24.99, they would have sold a lot of copies. While Microsoft does offer an IAP for $99 per year (the cost of the 365 subscription), there is no way use Apple's Volume Purchase Program with IAP. Can you imagine if the iPhone only supported Exchange mail/calendars/contacts if you were using Exchange 365?

Update: Another failure (hopefully a bug) by Microsoft with this app.

Everpix Review

I first learned about Everpix from its sponsorship of Daring Fireball. I have a very simple and specific way of managing photos. The downside to this method is that I rarely go back and look at old photos. Photos are dropped in folders and are generally never to be seen again. I decided to give Everpix a whirl. They have a free tier that allows you to see exactly how the service works as it shows you all your photos taken within the past 12 months. There are tasks you can do to increase that as well (uploading 1,000 photos from a Mac/PC, referring friends, etc). While using the free tier, I quickly increased the 12 months to 33 months. Everpix is pretty simple to understand. John Gruber said it best during the sponsorship copy:

Bottom line: Everpix is what iPhoto/iCloud photo syncing should be.

Everpix is your photo library in the cloud. Apple's workflow is that you snap a photo on your iPhone, go to iPhoto on the Mac, and then download it from your photo stream into an album/event. That simply does not work for regular people. It requires a lot of steps and most people just end up leaving them on their camera roll.

Everpix aims to remove the friction for cloud based photo management. It supports importing (and organizing) from a ton of places: Mac, PC, iPhoto, iPad, iPhone, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Flickr, Picasa, Lightroom, and Aperture.

My workflow for Everpix was going to be simple. All of my photos are in a Dropbox folder that are organized by:

  1. Year (i.e. 2010)
  2. Month (2010-05)
  3. Optional Event (2010-05 Birthday Party)

All I needed to do was point the Everpix Mac app at that folder and let the magic happen. After everything had finished uploading and processing, I visited the web interface to begin browsing. I noticed that some of my photos were appearing in the wrong year. A quick email to support showed that the EXIF data in a few of my photos was wrong. I used this app to correct them and then Everpix picked up the changes.

Everpix is broken up into 5 sections:

  • Photo Mail

This is where photos that your friends send to you through Everpix will appear.

  • Explore

Everpix has built a pretty interesting feature here:

Using semantic data gathered from Everpix's Image Analysis, you can explore your collection through the content of each photo—animals, people, cities, nature, and even food.

  • Highlights

This section (broken up by year) analyzes your library and chooses what it feels like best represents that year.

  • Moments

This view displays all the photos in your collection (from various sources), but it's organized by date and time.

  • Sources.

This most closely represents my current Dropbox based structure. This would break apart your collection into iPhoto events, Flickr sets, Facebook albums, etc.

Everpix has created this article to further explain the different views.

After using the free tier of Everpix for a few weeks, I decided to go premium. I removed all the photos from my iPhone and only view them through the Everpix app and website. I have found myself browsing old photos, emailing them to my wife, and reminiscing about old times. That alone is worth the price. What good is a great collection of family photos if you never look at them? I am excited to see where this product goes in the future. I am also glad it's a paid product ($4.99/mo or $49/year). This is a solution I could see being a backbone of my photo management for years to come so I'd rather pay them directly vs waiting for a revenue model 'to appear'.

Apple And The Future of TV

In 2005, we all thought our cell phones were terrible. We were just waiting on Apple to save us. We are at that point with TV now. When you break it down, what do we really want Apple to do with TV? Are we just after a new interface or do we think we're going to get all the content we want $20 a month and bypass the cable company? I think most of us think we want the former but we really think the latter. We think we should be able to get all of the content we want (that we are paying $70-80 a month for now)and pay App store prices ($.99 a channel per month). That is probably not realistic. In fact, TV content prices will probably stay about the same on the mythical Apple product. I don't think it's the prices that we need Apple to save us from. Its the terrible UI and customer experience of existing products. We really aren't paying less for iPhones from the cellular carriers (in terms of monthly fees) than we were with a MotorolaQ, but we like our iPhones a lot more so we deal with the monthly fees. If Apple announced an Apple TV type product that had the ability to basically see my existing channels as Apps and allowed me to watch what I wanted (including live sports) for $70/mo, I'd sign up immediately. Hollywood level content isn't cheap to produce, so we probably shouldn't look to Apple to be able to drive the cost down. Just as they haven't made cellular data rates fall to $10/mo for unlimited, we shouldn't expect our TV content pricing to fall much either. I'd love to pay a lot less for content, but I don't think that is within Apple's power. I want Apple to make me love the UI of my TV just as they did with the iPhone.

Learning to Love Evernote Discussion Around The Web

Alpha Efficiency:

Book for this week is an iBook with screencasts of Evernote. Learning To Love Evernote caught me flat footed with certain tips, that I had no clue of even as a veteran of Evernote. From all the Evernote books I’ve seen so far, this one is most rounded and tailored for people who still didn’t catch up on all of it’s features. It gives a neat overlay of all the functionality you might have missed.

Macstories.net:

I watched the videos, and I think Bradley did a good job in providing a general overview of Evernote, as well as offering some useful tips on how to use it on OS X and iOS.

@iBookstore Twitter Account:

.@BradleyChambers helps you love #Evernote. He shares his favorite tips in how-to tutorials. http://tw.apple.com/Nzg

512 Pixels:

$4.99 gets you an hour of screencasts as .mp4 files or wrapped up as an iPad-ready iBook. They’re all well done, and Bradley is a great teacher.

If you’ve been Evernote-curious or want to get more out of the app, be sure to check it out.

Katiefloyd.me:

Bradley Chambers released a series of video tutorials today "Learning to Love Evernote." I've had a chance to preview them and already picked up several tricks. In total, the package contains 10 screencasts for about an hour worth of content and covers the basics of setting up Evernote and goes through various workflows of using Evernote for storing specific types of content to give you a few ideas of the types of things you can do. The package is $4.99 and available in an iBooks author version for iPad or as downloadable videos.

Tools and Toys

Learning to Love Evernote is a series of screencasts by Bradley Chambers that have been gathered into an iBook for iPad. The videos are geared toward people who want to use Evernote, but haven’t quite figured out how to fit it into their workflow yet. It first covers the basics of the Evernote interface (notebooks, stacks, etc) and then shows you different ways you can organize your personal life.

Generational Podcast 35:

This week Bradley Chambers joins Erik and Gabe to talk about information capture and recall with Evernote.

I was also thrilled to be featured under the 'New and Notable' section in the iBookstore.

I have been blown away from the comments on how it has helped viewers to take Evernote to a new level. I am hard at work planning an update to this set and working on an entirely new Evernote related concept.

Is Samsung The New Dell?

Gregg Keizer:

Dell last week again blamed Windows 8 for contributing to a decline in PC sales revenue during the quarter that ended May 3. "Windows 8 has been, from our standpoint, not necessarily the catalyst to drive accelerated growth that we had hoped it would be," said Brian Gladden, Dell's CFO, in a call last week with Wall Street analysts to discuss the quarter's financials. Gladden's convoluted syntax aside, this was the second time that Dell pushed Windows 8 under the bus.

Yes, I am sure that Windows 8 hasn't helped Dell at all, but what has Dell done to help Dell? Dell is paying the price for not following the Tim Cook doctrine (The need to own and control the primary technologies behind the products you make). They relied on Microsoft for years to function. It was a nice system for a long time. Dell churned out mediocre PCs running an OS that someone else had to deal with.

At the same time, he also dashed cold water on the near future. "But you look at the recent external data from any of the third-party sources, we would expect to continue to see over the next few quarters year-over-year declines in PC demand," Gladden said, referring to projections by the likes of IDC and Gartner that PC shipments -- and thus sales -- would continue to suffer as consumers and businesses alike buy smartphones and tablets rather than new personal computers.

When you don't own the OS, you will be reliant on someone else to drive innovation. There is only so far hardware can take you. If the OS fails to innovate, there will be less demand for your hardware.

Let's rewrite the above excerpts, but change Dell to Samsung and Windows to Android.

Samsung last week again blamed Android 14 for contributing to a decline in smartphone and tablet sales revenue during the quarter that ended May 3. "Android 14 has been, from our standpoint, not necessarily the catalyst to drive accelerated growth that we had hoped it would be," said Ju-Hwa Yoon, Samsung's CFO, in a call last week with Wall Street analysts to discuss the quarter's financials. Yoon convoluted syntax aside, this was the second time that Samsung pushed Android 14 under the bus.

At the same time, he also dashed cold water on the near future. "But you look at the recent external data from any of the third-party sources, we would expect to continue to see over the next few quarters year-over-year declines in smartphone and tablet demand," Yoon said, referring to projections by the likes of IDC and Gartner that tablet and smartphone shipments -- and thus sales -- would continue to suffer as consumers and businesses alike buy (insert future product category) rather than new smartphones and tablets

Samsung is enjoying a nice ride currently. Google is doing the heavy lighting (making an OS is a really difficult project) and Samsung is reaping the rewards. What are its alternatives if Google fails to innovate in the coming years or moves on to a different product category? Just as Dell has struggled to make software on its on PCs (everyone who knows how immediately uninstalls it), Samsung hasn't proven itself any better. If Samsung can't seem to write decent software, why would we expect more from an OS they might create.

It's quite possible that in 2023, Samsung will be in the same situation that Dell is in today (stuck in a declining industry with no way out).

RSS Feed Update

Like most websites these days, I am moving away from Feedburner for RSS feed tracking. There shouldn't be any hiccups on your end, as I am handling the redirection inside of Feedburner. If you notice anything strange, please let me know. The new feed is: http://feeds.uri.lv/chambersdaily. The link is also on the left of the site. If you want to be sure you are not going to have any issues, feel free to re-subscribe using that link.

Announcing 'Learning To Love Evernote'

I am happy to announce my latest project: Learning to Love Evernote. Have you always wanted to love Evernote, but never really got it? I completely understand! I was in your same place for 4 years, but just recently saw the light. I want to share with you how I learned to love Evernote!

Some of the things you will learn:

  1. Storing manuals for appliances
  2. Organzing things your kids make at school
  3. Using the Evernote webclipper to store recipies offline
  4. Keeping track of you car maintenance schedule

Learn More and Purchase

Surface Is The New Zune

Bill Gates:

“A lot of those users are frustrated. They can’t type. They can’t create documents. They don’t have Office there. So we are providing them something with the benefits they have seen that have made that a big category, without giving up what they expect in a PC.”

There are plenty of bluetooth keyboards and people seems to be getting work done just fine without Office. I believe that the biggest mistake that Microsoft has made in recent years is not releasing Office for iPad in 2010. Fast forward to 2013 and folks are realizing that "work" doesn't always require Microsoft Office.

You’d think that if a signficant portion of the tablet market really does want the more chimeric device Gates describes, Surface would be doing quite a bit better at market than it is currently. But it’s not. Not yet, anyway.

This is a repeat of the Zune vs iPod scenario. Apple innovates and Microsoft copies. The Zune was a really nice MP3 player, but it wasn't drastically better than an iPod at anything. While Microsoft was building the Zune, Apple was building the iPhone and iPod touch.

Are Apple's Massive Profits Immoral?

Joe Thinker:

Among my friends and acquaintances it is no secret that I loathe several big players in the proprietary computer field, including Adobe, Oracle, Microsoft and Apple (among others). These corporations have created business models that allow them to extort ever-increasing profits from their myopic customers. Of those noted, I consider Apple to be the worst offender, by far.

Why is Apple the worst? Would not every company in the world want to trade places with them? They sell a few products at a premium price and have a great profit margin.

As greedy as Microsoft may be, Apple seems a clear winner in the race to extort money from customers. Whether it's their proprietary hardware requiring special converter cables to connect them to the rest of the world where standards rule, or their over-the-top prices for everything they manufacture, or expensive add-ons and expansions such as the referenced article describes, Apple is never shy about reaping every last penny from their zombie customer base.

It seems that what Joe is disagreeing with a capitalism at its core. Apple does not have a monopoly on any industry. If you don't want a Mac, buy a Windows PC. If you don't want an iPhone, buy a Samsung phone. If you don't want to buy music from iTunes, purchase it from Amazon. Consumers vote with their wallets, not with their opinions.

I think the saddest aspect of this greedy mania is what it says about their customers. These are not people with technical expertise who are buying Apple products because they are somehow getting better technology—because they're not! In fact, Apple has frequently boasted about how easy (supposedly) their devices are to use for total ignoramuses. I think they got the characteristics of their core target demographic just about right.

Joe is now insulting Apple customers now along with Apple.

Where money is no object, Apple products tend to do very well. Thorstein Veblen had something to say about that peculiar phenomenon in his Theory of the Leisure Class. Meanwhile, people around the world, especially outside the USA, will gravitate toward Linux, a free operating system that is less vulnerable to hackers, much less likely to crash, much more compliant with international standards, and capable, with thousands of free add-on software programs, of doing everything that Apple and Windows machines can do.

This will be the year of Linux on the desktop!

On the other hand, if you simply want dependable, completely functional and affordable computing capability at a reasonable price, avoid Apple products like the plague—unless you're a Republican!

We just need to move along here. He's gone down a rabbit hole.

David Carnoy with CNET:

You see, I've been around iOS devices long enough to know that 16GB of storage space just doesn't cut it -- throw a couple of high-res games and an HD movie or two on the thing, and you're starting to hit the limit. That put me at $429 for the 32GB model. Tack on the extra dough for sales tax and suddenly I was over $450. And that doesn't include the $29 Apple wants for Lightning-to-30-pin adapter that will allow me to use my old Apple connectors with the Mini.

You will convince Apple to charge less for upgrades when you don't buy its products. Buying about it and complaining is about the same as buying it and not complaining.

Steve Jobs had a pretty good insight on this when discussing it at the D8 Conference:

"Well things are packages. Some things are good in a product, some things are bad. If the market tells us we're making bad choices, we'll make changes. We're just trying to make great products. We don't think this is great and we're going to leave it out. We're going to take the heat because we want to make the best product in the world for customers! If we succeed, they'll buy them! If we don't, we won't sell any. And I have to say, people seem to be liking the iPad!"

If you don't like Apple making insane profits, then don't buy its products. Making profits in an environment where there is ample competition is not immoral, but rather just good business.

Voice Memos and Evernote

One of the things that I've been trying to capture is my son talking at a young age. I really wanted to capture him saying things as only a toddler does, but I needed a way that was easy to process and organize. I chose to store it in an Evernote notebook called 'Children Voice Memos".

The ability to email items into your Evernote database is a powerful tool as most iOS apps support export via email. The first step is to actually thing record something in the Voice Memos app and then share via email.

You then want to enter your Evernote email address. If you enter @Your Notebook Name into the subject, it will automatically organize it. I would also recommend adding a description of what you are storing. Tap on send and you are done! Once you open Evernote, you will see your .m4a file properly organized and playable.

Vigil: Website Monitoring App

Vigil is a simple iPhone app that monitors your website. It's a $9.99 In App Purchase and includes an unlimited number of websites. It let me know a few minutes faster when one of the work websites I manage went down on Sunday night. It includes customizable settings for notification sensitivity that can be managed on a site by site basis.

My only complaint is the IAP model. I will be paying for this through my work, so it's easier to put it directly on a corporate card instead of having to get reimbursed after the fact.

The One Where Dell Admits It Doesn't Know Anything About The Post-PC era

Andre Meier:

But they’re just that – instant reasons. Not well thought–out, reasoned, planned decisions. After the first blush of tablet mania, we’re now at the point where it’s time for serious, planned adoption. There’s now a great deal more choice in terms of platforms out there, and plenty of approaches to managing them. This is where Dell Channel partners can really help their customers make the right decision for their business – a new wave of technology brings with it new complexities.

So everything from 2010 to April of 2013 was just a test run? I guess we shouldn't tell all of the schools and businesses who are deploying iPads that they need to start over with a 'real tablet'.

If the first tablet wave was about the user experience, the second is about effective management and support and productivity. We know they work, they’re useful and that users love them. But we need to prove that, in a corporate environment, they don’t become an expensive headache – and that they do things that provide good to the company buying and supporting them, rather than just the users.

Apple is clearly ignoring the enterprise.

We commissioned Principled Technologies to research the total cost of ownership of tablets – specifically, to compare the cost of managing a thousand Apple iPads and a thousand Dell Latitude 10 tablets over three years. A few highlights: Latitude 10 deployment is 17 times faster, and 94 percent cheaper to deploy, than the iPad. Printing is $5,000 cheaper, as the Latitude 10 doesn’t need printer workstations to print. Latitude 10’s battery replacement can be done in seconds on-site by a company’s desktop support staff – while iPads have to go back to Apple. If half of batteries require a replacement over the three years, that adds up to a lot of iPads going back to Apple – and not in the hands of staff in the meantime.

Are you serious? The study that you commissioned found results that are against the iPad? Are people really complaining about sealed batteries in 2013? I thought we had moved past that arguement.

The iPad is a very popular gaming and media tablet – but it’s a consumer device in a business world and now it’s time for business tablets to get the job done efficiently and effectively. Dell Partners are in a particularly good position to help their customer roll out mobile devices that truly support their employees now and as their needs and requirements change.

There is no possibility of a consumer device making it in the workplace. No chance of a single device being good for work and home.

Here is the link to the PDF if you want to have this gem saved for later.


Additional Thoughts On App Store Economics

I've been thinking a lot of about the environment of App Stores (specifically Apple).  There as been a lot of discussion around the economics of the App Store model recently that seemed to start with this post by Michael Jurewitz.  I had some additional thoughts over the weekend, so I wanted to explain my thoughts further.  

The iOS App Store was a 'green field' for a few years.  There previously had been no decent way to get apps onto a mobile phone.  Apple changed all of that with a simple way to purchase and install apps.  It was a frictionless experience.  Everyone wanted to try it.  People were creating apps that solved problems that most of us did not know we had (hence the term: there's an app for that).  We were all discovering our 'mobile workflows'.  We were eager to try different types of apps.  The iPhone was still a new device, so it was growing at an incredible rate.  Since it was a new device, it was generally new to iPhone customers (rather than upgrades).  Think about your app downloading habits from 2008-2010 vs 2013.  We've all settled into our workflows and usage patterns.  We aren't actively searching for new things as often as we used to.  I've noticed an interesting thing in my usage as well.  It seems like most of the apps I download now are generally tied to a back end services (the Nest app is an example).  We aren't hearing the stories about a $1.99 game allowing a guy to quit his day job.  The iOS platform is still a profitable way to earn a living, though.  It's requiring more effort on a developers part, though.  The market is saturated with tons of quality applications in most every genre.  Developers are having to work a lot harder to stand out among the crowded.

Here is an example: a new city is created.  There would be no businesses in operation inside of this city at its founding  Lets also say that the rules of this city say that you can only do business with someone inside of the city.  I would immediately open an insurance agency.  I'd be the only approved place inside the town to buy insurance.  Would others have the same idea? Absolutely, but there would be so many new potential customers that each person would earn a nice living.  As the city grew, more people would want to sell insurance.  With each agency that opens, everyone else would get a smaller slice of the pie.  How does this equate to app purchasing?  Folks generally only have 1 or 2 'to do' applications.  There is only so many developers that can earn a living making one.  As in any business, only the strong survive.  The best apps will continue to grow, but the marginal ones will not survive.  It's no different than in the restaurant industry or any retail establishment.  You either compete on price, offer something unique, or battle for the same customers.  This is true app developers just as it is for a home builder.  The iOS App Store was like a new city, but now its a more established place to live.  It's a nice place to have a business, but you need to offer something compelling to survive.  One final thought: Consider your buying habits in the Mac App Store vs the early days of the iOS app store.  I know that I didn't spend near as much time searching for new apps in the Mac App Store as I did the iOS.  My workflows were already pretty much set by the time it was released.

I've heard a lot of developers talk about the risk of putting so much time and effort (and money) into an app and not know how it's going to sell.  How is that different with any business?  If I am going to start a restaurant, I've still got to lease/buy a building, buy equipment, buy food, and hire a staff before I can ever serve the first meal.  Choosing to develop apps is no more of a risk than buying a Taco Bell franchise or opening a clothing store.  The strong will always rise to the top.

App Store Economics Are Just Business Economics

Marco Arment:

I haven’t always used these particular apps to solve these problems, but it takes a lot to change my mind on one. If you make another RSS reader or Twitter client, there are certainly a lot of people who could use it, but you’ll need to compete with very mature, established apps. Competing in these categories isn’t about price: it’s about relevance and attention. If you can’t find enough customers here, it’s probably not because you’re charging $2.99 instead of $1.99 or $0 — it’s because your app isn’t convincing enough people that it’s worth using over the alternatives.

Federico Viticci also said:

This is also the same problem I run into every time I’m sent new apps to review: is this going to be better than Tweetbot, Fantastical, or Drafts for my workflow? Should my readers know about this app even if I won’t use it every day? How do I balance the expectations of my readers, who want to know about new apps, with my personal opinions and workflow preferences?


App store economics are largely just general business economics.  If I am going to start a pest control company, I've got 3 options:

1.  Offer the same product and lower my price below competitors
2.  Offer the same product at the same price as my competitors
3.  Offer a revolutionary new way of doing pest control (i.e. only needed once every 24 months)

An app developer has largely the same options when releasing a new app in a genre that is well served.

1.  Offer the same product and lower the price below competitors
2.  Offer the same product at the same price as competitors
3.  Offer a revolutionary new way of doing whatever apps in that genre do

Based on those options, a lot of developers just simply choose option 1.

Let's look at Panic's Status Board.  They are charging a premium and it seems to be selling well (based on the press around it).  It's not $.99, though.  Why can they charge a premium price? They went with option 3.  If I am wanting to launch a new service based company, I have to try to either create a market for myself or compete with the incumbent players.  My favorite Wi-Fi vendor (Aerohive) also went with option 3 when they launched controller-less enterprise WI-Fi.  They offered a product with similar goals as Aruba and Ruckus, but with a revolutionary way of doing it.  There is already a business term for this effect.  It's called Blue Ocean Strategy.  A blue ocean market is where you've changed the game and your competitors aren't relevant in the discussion.  The incumbent competitors are competing in a red ocean (for your scraps). 

My advice to app developers? Look for blue oceans and you can charge a premium.

Using an iPad as a Time Clock Solution

Hardware
We chose an iPad 2 running the latest version of iOS as the input device.  I have turned on guided access and set it where the only accessible section is the actual webpage portion of Safari.  I had the login page of the time clock software pulled up before turning on guided access.  I am not sure that our employees would want to be browsing Facebook at the time clock, but you never know.  We mounted the iPad to the wall using this mount.  The mount was very easy to put together and it seems very durable.  One nice touch of the mount is that it enclosed the dock connector portion of the sync cable inside of it.  This would keep someone from unplugging it (to play a joke). 

Software
We chose TimeClock Plus Web edition because it integrated nicely into our payroll system (I've been told it will take our payroll process down to 3 hours from 1.5 days).  The software seems to work well enough.  It's not iPad optimized, but we've had a good experience thus far.  Their support has been top notch as well.

Conclusion
This is a perfect example of how flexible the iPad is as a device.  It can really be whatever you want it to be.  I'd venture to say that this solution cost about the same as buying an actual time clock as well.

Pre-Software Launch Checklist for Education Developers

If you are making any sort of software for education, please make sure of the following:

  1. The app needs have a built in updating mechanism (if non App Store).  If your app requires a teacher to download a full .dmg file for each update, you did it wrong.
  2. Please avoid In App Purchasing on iOS.  Schools have no VPP options to upgrade.
  3. It needs to work 99.9999% of the time.  If you product requires an IT person to constantly fix things, the teacher will likely stop using it.  Teachers do not like to tinker with things.
  4. Your app will be used by teachers who are busy with parent meetings, grading papers, creating lesson plans, and trying to have some sort of life outside of school.  It needs to be simple.  You need to work hard to make it where it doesn't require a 3 day training class before you can get started.  A good example of how to correctly do is is Explain Everything.